Frankenstein and Genetic Modification

To be like Frankenstein is to be some superstar who creates replica or tempers with it. When Frankenstein created his monster, he created something more(prenominal) than that other(a) face on the existence: He opened doors to freshly opportunities, newfound discoveries, and a unhurt new kayoedlook on look. In the modern technological era, cosmos be the kindred. Humans take through with(predicate) many things that put down how they can play around with life, interchange sustenances, beings, living creatures, and counterbalance other piece. Homo sapiens wee-wee shown themselves further to be like Frankensteins, when the displaceation of virtuoso bole part from mavin being into another was successful. Unfortunately, bloody shame Shelley?s Frankenstein ends in sum destruction. The single question that remains is if the same everyow contract of humans. The way humans manipulate life is actu all(prenominal)y(prenominal) great, and how many multiplication they wee-wee d superstar so is much more than one can count on his fingers. Essentially, the manipulation of life meets through DNA, or rather the things that argon done with DNA. Cloning, being one very controversial topic, shows one how far humans have come with technology. Simply put, copy is taking one organism?s cell, taking out its nucleus (which contains the DNA), putting it into another cell where there is no nucleus, and waiting for it to grow. Unfortunately, clond organisms have a much higher fate of suffering from sicknesses, obesity and deformities. On top of all that, there is an extremely large puzzle with clone: when an organism that is 6 age old is cloned, its clone begins its life with 6 years ?on its clock?. This delegacy that it give live as if it has already lived 6 years, and it will die younger than a normal organism of that type. Dolly, who was the offset organism ever cloned successfully, died when she was 6 years old (a unfaltering sheep lives 12 -15 years), by and by developing arthritis ! (Williams 15-18). Thus, as science itself has proven, cloning is very technologically advanced, but is very dangerous for the ? guinea fowl pig?, as it is much more vulnerable. On the other hand, if humans can dispose life, they should be able to modify nourishment. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) argon food products that have been genetically engineered to better themselves on their weak qualities. such(prenominal) an example is the ?Flavr Savr? tomato, which was made to preventive fresh longer (Picard 88-94). for sure this helped the world a lot, since food stores and farms would not make as much food go to waste. Unfortunately, this process is very spoiled; it takes the removing and adding of strands of DNA. When playing with nature, diseases could arise and new bacteria can be formed, all coming from a single small miscalculation. Furthermore, passel feel that it is unnatural to eat foods that have been genetically modified, do debates to arise. Frankenstein?s mons ter, being created from body move from different tribe, was just a huge successful transplant. Nowa days, one can write down variety meat for transplants from other people and even animals (known as xenotransplantation). ordinarily coming from pigs or baboons, these organs are transplanted into humans in the hope that the body will accept the organ. One cannot maintain that it is a safe process, since a xenotransplantation has never been successful. Likewise, it is very dangerous because there is a chance of diseases moving from animals to humans.

such has happened in 1993, when a uncomplaining of received a transplant with a baboon?s liver. The patient died in 22 days due to the p atient?s immune system, which succumbed to infection ! after 26 days (Peterson 62-68). Overall, it seems that humans are becoming Frankensteins, since they are cloning animals, creating GMOs, and transplanting organs between animals and humans. All modifications of life through science are very dangerous, stretching from creating new bacteria or diseases all the way to the dangers that put the ?guinea pig? at risk. Obviously, one is able to dictate that all means of manipulating life are dangerous. It is very ironic that Mary Shelley wrote this book, showing humans what would happen if the manipulation of life occurred, notwithstanding people?s missing to grasp technology is so great that their vision is sunless with thoughts of superiority. Works Cited ListNewspaper ArticlesWeise, Elizabeth. FDA: Cloned Animals Meat is Safe. the States Today 18 Dec. 2005. 30 Dec. 2006 . Williams, Chris. US to Approve Cloned Meat. The designate 28 Dec. 2006. 30 Dec. 2006 . Peterson, Drew. The History of Xenotransplantation. BBC Online. 19 Aug. 1999. 30 Dec. 2006 . Picard, Ken. emergence Concerns: Unearthing the Dirt Behind the Rise of GMOs. heptad Days. 25 Feb, 2003. 30 Dec. 2006 . Gilbert, Jenny. Birth, Life, Death - Its All in the parallelism Here. Independent UK 29 Jan. 2006. 30 Dec. 2006 . If you want to get a full essay, assemble it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay